Buffalograss Research Updates

Buffalograss Germplasm Maintenance & Evaluation

Buffalograss with seed heads.
Picture of buffalograss seed heads. 

Germplasm and its maintenance is an important aspect of any successful breeding program. Germplasm serves as a reservoir of genetics and traits that can be introduced into future breeding lines, leading to cultivars with superior performance.

Our program emphasizes collecting native buffalograsses growing in undisturbed sites throughout the region. Individual lines are evaluated over multiple seasons to determine if they have attributes that could be incorporated into future buffalograss cultivars. Key evaluation criteria include canopy density, gender expression, color and late season color retention, uniformity, competition with tall fescue, and overall visual turf quality. 

Lines of interest are often grouped with similar lines in crossing blocks to try and fix those desired traits into future breeding populations, simplifying downstream trait introgression. Crosses are then made into elite backgrounds to introduce those desirable traits into breeding lines, that are then advanced through our plant breeding pipeline.

Seeded Buffalograss Selections

Buffalograss is dioecious, having separate male and female plants, which comlpicates breeding since research is needed to develop male and female lines separately that when combined produce superior progeny or seeded populations. Buffalograss breeding is further complicated since there is a need to develp both seeded and vegetative lines separately. While both seeded and vegetative types require fast establishment, pest resistance, stand persistence, and good turf quality, there are notable differences in the breeding strategies and outcomes for each type. At a high level, seeded buffalograss requires parental female lines that are high yielding along with males that provide the pollen to support seed production. Vegetative lines are often clonally propagated female lines and there is a preference for minimal flower production and an absence of males. 

Objective

This project was designed to identify high yielding buffalograss populations with exceptional turf quality.

Table of buffalograss biomass and seed yield.
Figure 1. Results of various buffalograss lines biomass (Gams) and seeds (grams). 

Study

Advanced buffalograss breeding populations (n=14) derived from parents selected for chinch bug resistance, shade tolerance, establishment rate, turf quality, and yield were grown in isolated 10’ x 10’ plots. Seed from each plot was harvested each year over multiple years. 

Progress

Biomass and seed yield were collected and compared. On figure 1, individuals not producing at least 300 g seed per 100 sq ft plot (filled circle) were not continued. 

The remaining lines (plus symbol) were harvested again in the next season (triangles). Data from one of the advanced lines was not collected, but there was an increase in biomass and seed yield in most of the selected lines.

 

Elite Buffalograss Breeding Lines Evaluation

Data collection began on elite seeded buffalograss breeding populations that were developed to become the next generation of seeded buffalograss cultivars. 

Objective

Compare elite seeded material to industry standard lines and collect data that uniquely characterizes each line.

Buffalograss plots for breeding lines evaluation.
Buffalograss plots for testing breeding lines evaluation. 

Study

Seven experimental breeding populations were grown alongside five industry standard lines. The 12 lines were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four blocks.

Progress

The following rating criteria were used to characterize each line in the study.

Growth HabitEstablishment Rate
Internode LengthPlant Vigor
Internode DiameterTexture
Lateral SpreadLeaf Length
GenderLeaf Width
Plant HeightLeaf Color
Inflorescence HeightLeaf Pubescence
Inflorescence ColorFall Color Retention
Winter Hardiness and Survival

The first year of data collection completed in 2025 and it will be repeated in 2026. From this research we are able to distinguish the 12 experimental lines from eachother. There are plans for regional trials of these lines to be initiated in 2026.

Low Input Demonstration Established

It is often recommended to manage buffalograss with at least 1” of water per month and 2 lbs N/1,000 sq ft during the growing season. These minimal recommendations are designed to maintain turf cover with minimal resources; it is important to note that increases in water and N rates can enhance visual quality. Many buffalograss managers adopt buffalograss as a “no maintenance” species, and do not provide any supplemental irrigation or fertility.

Objective

Evaluate established plots of buffalograss, fineleaf fescue, perennial ryegrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and tall fescue over multiple years with no or minimal inputs.

Study

Two spoke and wheel plots were established and planted to new and old cultivars of buffalograss, fineleaf fescue, perennial ryegrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and tall fescue. Plots were established in 2025. One plot will be managed with no inputs and the other will be managed with buffalograss recommended inputs of 1” water per month and 2 lbs N/1,000 sq ft during the growing season.

Cultivar list

Blue Hornet  (Sheeps fescue), Cardinal II (Creeping red fescue), Nui and Apple 3GL (Perennial ryegrass), Blue Bonnet and Blue Note (Kentucky bluegrass), K-31 and Spyder (Tall fescue), and Cody and Sundancer (Buffalograss).

Various seeded types and cultivars of grasses on a spoke and wheel plot.
Various seeded grass types and cultivars on spoke and wheel plots. 

Progress

Plots were established and preliminary establishment data was collected.

Winter Dormancy Timing in Elite Vegetative Buffalograss Lines

Dormancy on buffalograss.
Dormancy effect on buffalograss plots.

Buffalograss is a warm-season species that enters winter dormancy in the fall following a hard frost and breaks dormancy in the spring as soil temperatures begin to warm, typically when soil temperatures approach 50 degrees F. A goal for vegetative buffalograss line development is to extend the growing season by identifying lines that enter dormancy later in the fall or break dormancy earlier in the spring. Care must be taken to avoid also selecting for lines that have compromised winter dormancy as that would make them susceptible to winter injury.

Objective

Develop a model to predict timing of winter dormancy and use the model to identify lines that greenup earlier in the spring.

Study

Collect 3” soil temperature data from an established buffalograss stand every two weeks during spring greenup. While collecting soil temperatures, also collect digital images that can be processed to quantify greenness levels. 

Progress

First year data was collected and plotted. A preliminary model was developed showing a nearly 5% increase in greenness per increased degree C after April 28th

More data is needed to refine and validate the model but we anticipate that it will provide a means for selecting lines that greenup faster in the spring or maintain their green color later into the fall.

National Turfgrass Evaluation Program Updates

NTEP Tall Fescue

Our program is managing the 2024 National Tall Fescue Test for the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP). Tall fescue is one of the most important lawn species managed throughout the region. The trial receives reduced irrigation and there are more observable differences between the varieties in the trial than in previous years when it has been managed under optimal conditions.

Objective

Evaluate new and experimental tall fescue lines relative to industry standard entries under reduced irrigation inputs in the central Great Plains region.

Bar graph showing the different cultivars of tall fescue in rating categories.
The number of tall fescue cultivars performing in the top statistical group for all 10 rating categories. For example, there were 13 cultivars that performing in the highest statistical group for 9 of the 10 categories. 

Study design

The study is arranged as a randomized complete block design with three replications and maintained at a three-inch mowing height. The study includes 108 tall fescue lines, including six standard entries. 

Progress

Data was collected for genetic color, spring greenup, spring and fall density, fall color, leaf texture, and monthly quality from April through October.  Significant differences were observed among all evaluated traits except for spring greenup, spring density, and April quality. 

Thirteen lines were among the top performers in 9 out of the 10 rating categories. Interestingly all but one was an experimental line, suggesting the next generation of tall fescues are expected to outperform the current cultivars evaluated in this trial.

NTEP Kentucky Bluegrass

Close up of Kentucky bluegrass NTEP plots.
Close up of Kentucky bluegrass NTEP plots. 

The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) coordinates several species and variety trials throughout the country. We are a test site for the multi-year 2023 National Kentucky Bluegrass test.

Kentucky bluegrass is an important turf species used throughout the region in lawns and athletic fields.

Objective

Evaluate new and experimental Kentucky bluegrass lines for performance in the central Great Plains region.

Study 

The study was established in September 2023 and arranged as a replicated complete block design with three replications. There are 56 entries maintained at a 2.5 inch mowing height under evaluation. 

Progress

Each Kentucky bluegrass plot was evaluated for genetic color, spring green-up, leaf texture, visual quality per month of the growing season, fall canopy density, and establishment rate. This year marked the first full year of the study and data has been submitted to NTEP. Once processed, data will be made publicly available through the NTEP website. Keep in mind that data is available for several sites, so if there is a trait you are interested in that was not evaluated in Nebraska, be sure to explore some of the other state reports.

NTEP Perennial Ryegrass

Perennial ryegrass NTEP plots.
Close up of Perennial ryegrass NTEP plots. 

The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) coordinates several species and variety trials throughout the country. We are a test site for the multi-year 2022 National Perennial Ryegrass test. Perennial ryegrass is an important turf species used throughout the region in lawns and athletic fields and is highly regarded for its rapid germination.

Objective

Evaluate new and experimental perennial ryegrass lines for performance in the central Great Plains region.

Study

The study was arranged as a randomized complete block design with three replications. It was established in September 2022 and maintained at a two-inch mowing height. There are 83 entries, including five standard entries.

Progress

Each perennial ryegrass plot was evaluated for genetic color, spring green-up, visual quality per month of the growing season, and establishment rate. Early data for this study is available through the NTEP website. Keep in mind that data is available for several sites, so if there is a trait you are interested in that was not evaluated in Nebraska, be sure to explore some of the other state reports.

Greens Studies

Tine Cultivation and Sand Incorporation Study

Sand tines incorporation study.

Objective

Evaluate pre- and post- tine cultivation sand incorporation as impacted by tine type.

Study

The study was arranged as a split plot randomized complete block design with three replications. Each plot measured 14 ft by 4 ft. Treatments were applied using a Toro Procore 648 with a 48” swath.

Main Plots (42’ X 60’ with a 6’ border between)

  1. Topdress before tines with 0.25” on surface (equates to 1 ton/1000 ft2 or 20 ft3/1000ft2

  2. Topdress after tines

Sub-plots (tine treatments) set at 3-3.5” depth

  1. 5/8’ X 6" Viper Nose™ Quad 3/4" Mount (2600 RPM 2 ring on top setting 648)

  2. 1/2" X 6”Viper Nose™ Quad 3/4" Mount (2600 RPM 2 ring on top setting 648)

  3. 3/8 inch tine (4 ring on top setting 648)

  4. Talon Tine 1/2" x 6", 3/4" Mount (2 ring on top setting 648)

  5. 108-9198 TITAN SOLID ROUND 4.50" .25" OD (5 ring on top setting 648)

  6. 108-9202 TITAN SOLID ROUND 4.50"  .50" OD (5 ring on top setting 648)

  7. 108-9170 SIDE EJECT MAX 4.75” .28" ID (5 ring on top setting 648)

  8. 108-9221 TITAN CROSS 4.50" – .50"OD (5 ring on top setting 648)

  9. 108-9239 TITAN SOLID SLICING 4.50" .75" OD (5 ring on top setting 648)

  10. 108-9161 SIDE EJECT 4.75" .53" ID .66" OD (5 ring on top setting 648)

  11. 114-0551 TITAN HOLLOW EXT. TAPER 5.75" .53"ID  .66" OD (2 ring on top setting 648)

  12. DryJect 3X3

  13. Untined Control

  14. DryJect 2X3

Data Collection

  • 24-48 hrs after treatment sample for OM with ¾” sampler; sample 0-1”, 1-2”, 3-4”, 4-5” sampled monthly.

  • 24-48 hrs infiltration with single ring infiltrometer, sampled monthly.

  • TDR weekly after nighttime irrigation; 2 depths.

  • Quality 1-9 weekly; 1=Unacceptable, 6= acceptable.

  • Cultivation recovery visual estimate weekly. Scale 1-9 as a percentage recovery. 

  • Digital image of “pie” slice sampler to include aeration hole; weekly for 3-6 weeks.  Take a sample near edge of plot. 

  • GS3 or green speed weekly starting 3-4 days post treatment.

Wetting Agents Study

Wetting agents study plots.
Wetting agents plot to promote localized dry spots. 

Objective

Evaluate wetting agent longevity with dry-down periods promoting localized dry spot.

Study

The study was arranged as a randomized complete block design with four replications. Each plot was 5 ft x 10 ft. Treatments (water control or two wetting agents) were applied monthly from August through November. After treatment, plots were dried to wilting, evaluated, and then rewetted before starting the dry down again for two dry down cycles between each application.

Data Collection

Volumetric water content at multiple depths, visual quality, visual estimation of recovery, green speed, and surface firmness were measured 3-5 days post each dry down event.

Seeding and Weed Management Studies

Consumer Seeding Evaluation

Objective

  1. Determine establishment and quality of a random sample of cool season turfgrass mixtures available to consumers.

  2. Determine if the use of mesotrione at seeding influences establishment and quality.

Study

The study was arranged as a randomized split block design with 3 replications. There were 12 entries and 2 mesotrione treatment (with or without). Each plot measured 5 ft by 5 ft.

Progress

The study is complete, but the plots are maintained to see the long-term benefit of the early mesotrione application. See images and progression of turf performance below.

40 days after seeding in May.
May- 40 Days after seeding. 
65 days after seeding in June.
June- 65 Days after seeding. 
125 days after seeding in August.
August- 125 Days after seeding. 

 

Herbicide Selection Results for Foxtail Before or After Emergence in Turfgrass Areas

Foxtail trial plots at East Campus Turfgrass Research Center
Research plots of Kentucky bluegrass for testing herbicide selection. 

This study was conducted at the University of Nebraska’s East Campus Turf Research Center at Lincoln, NE, on a 7-year-old stand of Kentucky bluegrass mismanaged with low fertility and low mowing to encourage yellow foxtail growth.  Populations of foxtail ranged from 12-40% over the course of the trial in untreated plots. The stand was mowed at 2 inches and irrigated to prevent drought stress. Plots were 5' x 5' and sprayed with a CO2 backpack sprayer using a 3-nozzle boom with 8002 vs nozzles at 30 psi. Treatments were initiated on May 5th with separate timings with or without a sequential application starting on June 27th at 3-5 leaf foxtail and or July 15th at 3 tiller foxtail. At no time during evaluations did any of these products result in damage to the Kentucky bluegrass stand. 

More Information

Athletic Field Applied Research

Bermudagrass Traffic Adaptation in Lincoln, Nebraska

Traffic on bermudagrass applied research plots.
Traffic and non-traffic plots with and without overseeding plots on three different cold-tolerant hybrid bermudagrass types. 

 

Objective

Evaluate three different hybrid cold-tolerant bermudagrass cultivars with different overseeding applications and rates following traffic simulation.  

Experiment Design 

Max Mueller using traffic simulator on research plots.
Max Mueller (agronomy student) is using the modified traffic simulator on research plots.  

The study area is 50 ft x 108 ft and established to randomized strips of Tahoma 31, Latitude 36, and IronCutter bermudagrass. The area was managed using standard bermudagrass management with nitrogen fertilizer (0.5 to 1 lb per 1,000 sq ft) applied from July to September and irrigation applied as needed to prevent wilt. The area was mowed at 0.75 in two times per week. Traffic is applied perpendicular to the bermudagrass strips and simulated by a modified Toro ProCore 648 (right) with feet constructed of 9 total 0.5 in spikes per section (total of 6 sections). The spikes are like those used for the Husker Football student-athletes. Each traffic pass equals one traffic day of football. Plots were then seeded at different rates of 0, 2, 5, or 10 lbs per 1000 sq ft. with HGT Kentucky bluegrass (KBG), SunRye perennial ryegrass (PRG), or no overseeding. Each seeding was split by seeding method (slit seeder (SS) or drop spreader (DS)). Seeding was initiated for some plots in July, and others were delayed until August. Overseeding continued through mid-October. Data collected from August to mid-November.  

Progress 

Year 1 (2024)   Available Here

Year 2 (2025) 

The overall mean for the 2025 result was 51.442 Gmax for Clegg and 16.231 N*M for the shear test. NDVI was also measured for color in the first replication portions with average in 2025 of 0.564, with data collected from mid-August to November. There were 94 traffic days for the 2025 data results. More results will be available later on the turf.unl.edu website. 

Kentucky bluegrass Traffic in Nebraska

HGT Kentucky bluegrass plot receiving traffic (left) or not (right).
Traffic (left) and non-traffic (right) plots of HGT Kentucky bluegrass at East Campus Turfgrass Research Center.

Objective

Test traffic adaptation of HGT and 365ss Kentucky bluegrass (KBG) blends in Lincoln, NE. 

Study

Two 17 ft x 8 ft plots were established to either HGT or 365ss Kentucky bluegrass in May 2023. The plots were divided by traffic treatment (traffic or no traffic). Traffic was simulated with a modified traffic simulator.

Progress 

Current progress showed higher shear strength in no traffic for both KBG cultivars than in traffic areas for the 2024 and 2025 results. This is also similar in result of the NDVI. For the clegg (Gmax), It is higher with Gmax for traffic on HGT than in 365ss KBG traffic. 

Sections in 2025 UNL Turfgrass Science and Management Update